Early exam in Russian profile level

Good day, dear applicants. Many of you are interested in what happened behind the scenes of the early Unified State Exam 2016. This was preceded by dozens of messages in my personal VKontakte and I will lift the veil of secrecy for you, tell you about my impressions of checking the second part and we will analyze with you the real version of the second part and tell you about that What does the early Unified State Exam look like this year?

Impressions from the early stage

Let's start with my impressions of the first part, which, I admit, I saw briefly. But with a quick run through the option, I can say the following: the early Unified State Exam was not difficult. I will substantiate this on real tasks. As you know, this year they radically changed the structure of the entire work - they removed the test part and rearranged the tasks of the current first one. According to a quick analysis of the option, the first five tasks and Nos. 7-9, 11 were given without any difficulties to those who worked out the dates and worked with official documents, including the list of dates from FIPI. There would be no surprises here, as I believe, for a prepared person

Next you will be greeted with the following type of tasks: working with a map and illustrative material. From the maps, I can remember a map of the settlement of tribal unions of the Eastern Slavs, there was a map for the era of feudal fragmentation, the Battle of Kursk, the socio-economic development of Russia in the 19th century... Something, of course, could cause difficulties, but there were no surprises from the compilers , according to the type of names of merchants/names of plants and factories, as last year

“Pictures” pleased the majority of applicants. The only difficulty was caused by a friend whose famous children's song is attached below. Whoever found out, write in the comments :) It was necessary to choose 2 positions for him and the composer with whom he/she collaborated. I'm waiting for your suggestions. For the rest: Vysotsky, Tsoi, the main architectural monuments of the 18th century, posters from the 20-30s of the 20th century

Well, now let’s move on to the analysis of the tasks of the second part:

Assignments No. 20-22: early Unified State Examination in history 2016

No. 20. What period in the history of the USSR are we talking about in the article? Name, using knowledge from the history course, the two main opposition I.V. Stalin's directions among the party elite of the described time. What were the features of their views?

No. 21. Name the purpose of the repressions organized by I.V. Stalin against authoritative party and government figures. Give at least two facts and phenomena related to this process in the army.

No. 22. Indicate at least five reasons that, according to S.A. Kislitsyn, led to the destruction of the internal party opposition to Stalin

Test solution

So, how can you complete this task? Naturally, reading the text 🙂 The murder of Kirov, for knowledgeable boys and girls, already says that this is the 1930s. The groups are secretly highlighted in the text: S. Syrtsova and T. Ryutin (supporters of the liberalization of the Soviet Union and moderate reforms). Well, let’s touch on the “party boyars”, tell you who they are and get 2 points for the twentieth task

Goal: establishing a centralized system of state power and control of the masses

Facts and phenomena:
1) Many representatives of the Red Army were repressed (example: Tukhachevsky, Blucher)
2) During the Soviet-Finnish war, a serious blow was dealt to the country’s defense capability

1. Fetishization of the CPSU (b)
2. Infantilism
3. Separation from the people
4. Ambition of party members
5. Detachment from human values

We will continue to work on the option in the following articles, very, very soon, if this article receives a response. Like, share articles on social networks, so you help the project and then we will analyze the early Unified State Examination in History 2016 as soon as possible. See you soon, Ivan Nekrasov was with you. Bye everyone!

Want to understand all the topics in your history course? Sign up to study at Ivan Nekrasov’s school with a legal guarantee of passing the exam with 80+ points!

A) a violation of the connection between the subject and the predicate.

a) breaks the main clause with subordinate clauses and see if the subjects and predicates agree in each pair (this

constructions like Those who... Many of those who.... All who);

b) abbreviations, define the keyword and see if it agrees with the predicate in gender and number;

c) geographical names, we determine the gender of nouns by gender (river - she, city - he, etc.), look,

whether this subject agrees with the predicate in gender.

d) words whose gender many do not know (chimpanzee, cockatoo, veil, etc.), see if these words are consistent with the predicate by gender.

Of all the above in the sentences we find only the construction everyone who... in the 2nd sentence. Let's look carefully:

"All , who listened speech by the professor, once again was I was surprised by the brightness, originality and depth of his speech." In color

The basics of 2 sentences are highlighted. At the heart of the main sentence, the subject and predicate “everything was” are not consistent in number.

A - 2. After making a decision, do not forget to cross out the options in KIMakheti so that they no longer bother you.

B) incorrect use of the case form of a noun with a preposition.

We are looking for derivative prepositions. Come across especially often thanks, in agreement, in spite of . These prepositions require a dative

case. Let's see if there are any such words in the proposed sentences. Bingo! Sentence 5: "Contrary to the recommendations of doctors

the athlete did not reduce the load during training." Let's look at what case the word "recommendations" is in. What? Recommendations.

Genitive case, a d.b. dative.

B - 5

C) incorrect construction of a sentence with an adverbial phrase

First of all, find sentences that contain an adverbial phrase. Their M.B. some. Let us recall the questions of participles:

doing what? what did you do?

We have 2 sentences with participial phrases:

3)Low above the horizon is being created incorrect performance about the size of the Moon.

4)Finding yourself in the house of strangers , wait when you are introduced.

We emphasize the basics: “a view is being created” and “wait.” We make sure that the offers are not impersonal. If

you will see the impersonal, there is definitely a mistake there. Use participial phrases in impersonal proposals are not allowed. Now let's see

so that the action described in the adverbial phrase is performed by the one named in the subject. View cannot be located

low above the horizon. While you wait, you may end up in the house of strangers. Error in sentence 3.

IN - 3.

D) incorrect construction of sentences with indirect speech

Look for other people's words in quotation marks and the words “said”, “asked”, “thought”, “wrote”, etc. We don't have quotes. But the word “asked” is there.

7) I'm surprised asked what where is the fortress?

The words "Where is the fortress?" not changed, they should be framed as direct speech, but the author of the proposal made a hybrid from

direct and indirect speech.

G - 7.

D) an error in constructing a sentence with homogeneous members

First of all, we take sentences that generally have homogeneous members. And we pay attention to the presence in

sentences of double conjunctions (not only..., but also..., both..., and..., not so much..., but..., etc.)

We have already dropped offers 2, 5, 3, 7. There are no homogeneous members in 4, 6. We look carefully at the remaining proposals:

1) Wildlife sanctuaries are being created How For maintenance, so for recovery number of rare species of animals under

Around the month of May, versions of the Unified State Examination for the early period are published. The purpose of the publication is to provide graduates with an additional opportunity to prepare for the Unified State Exam.

Early versions of the Unified State Examination in History 2017

Published according to one version of the KIM used to conduct the Unified State Exam in the early period of 2017.

Changes in the structure of CMMs in history compared to 2016:

There are no changes in structure or content.

The maximum score for completing tasks 3 and 8 has been changed (2 points instead of 1). The wording of task 25 and the criteria for its assessment have been improved.

Total tasks (in brackets - including essay evaluation criteria) - 25 (31);

of which by task type:

with a short answer – 19;

with a detailed answer – 6 (12);

by level of complexity (including essay evaluation criteria): B – 16; P – 8; AT 7.

The maximum initial score for the work is 55.

The total time to complete the work is 235 minutes.

Structure of KIM Unified State Exam 2017 in history

Each version of the examination paper consists of two parts and includes 25 tasks that differ in form and level of difficulty.

Part 1 contains 19 short answer questions. The examination paper offers the following types of short-answer tasks:
– tasks for choosing and recording the correct answers from the proposed list of answers;

– tasks to determine the sequence of arrangement of these elements;

– tasks to establish the correspondence of elements given in several information series;

– tasks to determine according to the specified characteristics and write in the form of a word (phrase) a term, name, name, century, year, etc.

The answer to the tasks of Part 1 is given by the corresponding entry in the form of a sequence of numbers written without spaces or other separators; words; phrases (also written without spaces or other separators).

Part 2 contains 6 tasks with detailed answers that identify and evaluate graduates’ mastery of various complex skills.
Tasks 20–22 are a set of tasks related to the analysis of a historical source (attribution of the source; extraction
information; attraction of historical knowledge to analyze the problems of the source, the position of the author).

Tasks 23–25 are related to the use of techniques of cause-and-effect, structural-functional, temporal and spatial analysis to study historical processes and phenomena. Task 23 is related to the analysis of any historical problem or situation. Task 24 – analysis of historical versions and assessments, argumentation of various points of view using course knowledge. Task 25 involves writing a historical essay. Task 25 is alternative: the graduate has the opportunity to choose one of three periods of Russian history and demonstrate his knowledge and skills using the historical material most familiar to him. Task 25 is assessed according to a system of criteria.

On the Unified State Exam in history, there are usually a little more than 5 percent of students who score high. There are approximately twice as many poor students.

It is noted that not everyone knows how to work with maps and factual material. Schoolchildren often make mistakes when answering questions about the Great Patriotic War. Pupils do not always understand the difference between it and the Second World War.

Before exams, it is recommended to repeat the dates and refresh your memory of the names of commanders, heroes, and statesmen. Thus, at the Unified State Examination in 2016, about 20 percent of graduates wrote that the hero of the Soviet Union is the subversive fighter Lidia Ruslanova, executed by the Nazis in 1941, and not Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya. There were also those who sent Marshal Alexander Vasilevsky to battle in Chesme Bay in 1770, while during the Great Patriotic War he was the chief of the General Staff, commanded the 3rd Belorussian Front, and led the assault on Koenigsberg.