Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov. “A moral person. Essay-reasoning on the topic: “A moral person for me”

The true evolution of man is impossible without a moral life, subordinate to the fair interests of the society in which he lives; high moral principles, honor, conscience, helping those in need, constant enlightenment with knowledge...

In this article I would like to touch upon one of the most interesting topics, in my opinion: the question of the connection between human morality and his evolution. To expand on the topic, it is first necessary to shed light on the concepts themselves. "moral" And "evolution".

Moral- this is life according to conscience, when in thoughts, words and deeds a person is guided by the commandments of our great ancestors and the voice of reason, multiplied by the love of the heart.

Evolution- this is the development of bodies of the Essence of a person, additional to the physical body, or, in other words, bodies of the Soul, with the receipt of which a person acquires new opportunities and abilities. This is what allows a person to expand the range of his perception of reality and, upon reaching a certain level of development, to control space and matter.

The truth, forgotten by many, is that without moral life, true evolution is impossible. Nowadays, the interchangeability of the concepts “development” and “evolution” is widespread in society, although they do not mean the same thing. For example, a person learning a foreign language develops, that is, develops and increases his knowledge of the language being studied. Or a person involved in any sport also develops certain physical parameters. But neither a foreign language nor sports help a person make a qualitative leap, both in his perception and in his capabilities.

No matter how many languages ​​a person studies, and no matter how many sports he masters, he will still live within the existing limitations of the five senses. And this is a fact. The fact is so heavy and capacious that it is impossible not to comprehend it. It means that the mere accumulation of information does not at all guarantee the emergence of new opportunities and abilities in a person, and also does not make a person rational and moral. After all, the very word “ intelligence“means nothing more than “a mind sanctified by the divine light of truth,” and this light appears in a person from living according to conscience, that is, from a moral life. And there is no other way for this light to appear. Academician Nikolay Levashov wrote about it like this:

“...Even our ancestors shared two concepts - MIND and REASON! And in their understanding, these two concepts were fundamentally different from each other, although these two words have a common root, MIND! Matter, having realized its existence, acquires MIND! And only when the bearers of the mind achieve enlightenment with knowledge, only then does MIND appear!!! The ability to think does not yet mean intelligence - a state when a person is enlightened by knowledge, knowledge of the laws of nature from which he was born!..”(“Source of Life-5”).

This can be confirmed by academics who are unable to go beyond the existing dogmas in science; scientists plying each other for lucrative positions and titles; highly educated members of the governments of the world, whose actions contradict all norms of morality and rationality; businessmen who, for the sake of short-term profit, disfigure the environment with pollution from their industries, and so on, and so on...

During just one life in the physical body, a moral person can complete the planetary cycle of his evolution, developing in himself the etheric, astral and four mental bodies, which, together with the physical, make up the seven human bodies, which corresponds to the seven levels of the Earth formed by the seven primary matters. As Nikolai Levashov wrote, “The presence of mental bodies gives the person who has them colossal mental power, through which such a person can influence the processes occurring in nature, both on a local and on a planetary scale. Only with the power of your thoughts can you influence and control the processes occurring in human society. See and hear the past, present and future... and much more. Such power should and can only be had by a person with pure thoughts, a pure soul and a heart open to goodness.”(“Last appeal to humanity”). And the completion of the planetary cycle of human development gives him the opportunity to begin a qualitatively new stage of his development: cosmic stage of evolution.

After the death of the physical body, the Essence (Soul) of a person falls to the level of the Earth that corresponds to the evolutionary level that the Essence managed to achieve during the current life in the physical body. And no matter how smart a person is, no matter how much regalia, power and wealth he has, but if his life was not moral, he will not be able to get to the high levels of our planet for one simple reason: during his life such a person was not able to develop in himself the higher bodies of the Essence that provide such an opportunity. And if a person lived by instincts (emotions) or with a predominance of them, then he finds himself on the lower astral level of the planet, where criminals and simply unspiritual people, who are surrounded on these “floors” of the Earth by various “astral animals,” serve their “punishment.” And if the people who get there have weak energy protection, then they, in the literal sense of the word, can be eaten by these creatures. A “the death of the Essence means that all the evolutionary experience and achievements of all the incarnations that the Essence had disappear forever... this is evolutionary death...”(“Last appeal to humanity”).

Many people do not believe that by living morally they will be able to get what they want from life, because they see that often those who lead immoral lives have success and prosperity, in the modern understanding of these terms. Such people forget that external material success and wide access to a variety of pleasures are bought at too high a price: loss of Soul and, quite possibly, the impossibility of a further thousand-year life.

Our ancestors lived according to Vedic laws, which were given to them by their patrons - the Gods. Who were these Gods? By gods, the Slavic-Aryans understood people whose level of development far exceeded their own level. And the Gods of the Slavs - Svarog, Perun, Veles, Lada the Virgin and others - gave them moral commandments, the fulfillment of which inevitably leads a person to enlightenment with knowledge, the creation of ever new bodies of the Essence, and endless development. Fortunately for us, after many centuries of concealment of the “Slavic-Aryan Vedas”, some of them have now been published and are available for reading by everyone interested in the true past of Rus' and the whole world. And this means for us an excellent opportunity to study and understand the moral foundations on which the lives of our great ancestors were built, and therefore the opportunity to build our own lives on a solid foundation, proven by thousands of years of history.

Be truthful in Soul and Spirit,

The worlds hold on to the Truth. Their gate is Truth;

For it is said that in Truth rests Immortality.

(“Slavic-Aryan Vedas”, Santiya Vedas of Perun. First Circle. Santiya 4).

Follow us

Is a sympathetic person a moral person?

There are moments in every person's life when he is faced with a moral choice. The concept of morality is associated with the concepts of good. A moral person is a person who acts according to his conscience, not allowing lies, falsehood, or injustice towards other people, the world around him, or animals.

Responsiveness is a human quality that is characterized by a willingness to come to the aid of others, to understand someone else’s problem, and to be kind to people. A sympathetic person will never stand aside if someone needs his help, he will be ready to help even if it does not bring him anything or if it does not turn out very well for him.

These two concepts have always worried the minds of people. Different eras and centuries have passed, but the concepts of morality and responsiveness have never disappeared from our society.

Now many people say that we live in an era of indifferent people who are alien to responsiveness. People are angry at everything because of personal problems, the cause of which is the political and economic situation in the country and in the world. Everyone tries to live for themselves, their family, so responsiveness has now become a very rare quality. The moral level of many of our contemporaries is also constantly under attack from various temptations that fill the world. Bad habits, bad company, universal availability of information on the Internet - all this can shake the worldview of a person, especially the younger generation.

Writers at all times have paid attention to the problems of morality and compassion, because these qualities make us real people, capable of good deeds, who can change the world and make it better for everyone.

Let us remember the hero of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel “The Idiot” - Prince Myshkin. The writer himself said that he wanted to show a “positively beautiful” person. Responsive, kind and spontaneous Lev Myshkin became a black sheep among selfish people and egoists who dream only of a better life for themselves. Myshkin acted like a new Jesus Christ; he became the standard of kindness, openness, and sensitivity to the suffering of others. His actions were incomprehensible to those around him, who could see in him a mentally ill person, an “idiot,” but the sympathetic and kind Prince Myshkin was able to awaken deeply hidden good feelings in people, they saw in him an authoritative person, their idol, for whom they wanted to go anywhere he wouldn't have led. He became an example of a real person, moral and sympathetic. In contrast to this, it was not for nothing that Dostoevsky called the novel “The Idiot.” This topic is still relevant now, because at first people like Prince Myshkin can be mistaken for mentally ill people, because it looks so unusual and does not agree with the level of morality and morality of modern society.

If we take an opposite example, we can consider the image of Pechorin from Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time.” The main character is cold, calculating and indifferent to others; he does not care about the problems and feelings of other people. Even the unfortunate Bella, whose love Pechorin sought, soon becomes uninteresting to him, and the girl faces a tragic end. And this is not the only death in which Pechorin was involved. As the story progresses, we learn about Pechorin’s other “exploits” - he deceived Princess Mary, doomed Vera to torment... There was nothing sacred left in Pechorin’s soul; Chekhov called this state “paralysis of the soul.” He himself understood that he had become a “moral cripple”; even his own life became unbearable for him; he began to die as a friend, as a lover, and then as a person when he left for Persia, where he was destined to find his death.

Using the example of these two literary characters, we see two diametrically opposed points of view. Each of them has their own concepts of morality and responsiveness. If Myshkin is ready to do anything for the sake of others, then Pechorin, without hesitation, is ready to use all means to achieve the best for himself. We can conclude that a moral person will always be responsive, because these concepts are part of the general area of ​​the human soul. Morality and compassion go hand in hand. A morally rich person will never pass by those who need help; he will always show responsiveness. And this will spiritually enrich not only the one he helps, but will also elevate the soul of the person himself, who cannot act contrary to his beliefs.

Effective preparation for the Unified State Exam (all subjects) -

Morality and corresponding moral standards are the basis of civilization and humanity of any society. When morality and moral foundations collapse, society collapses and people degrade, which we can observe in our modern civilization, which is increasingly drowning in.

- this is following certain Spiritual (moral) Principles: the principles of Honor, Conscience, Duty, Justice, Love, etc. Morality is the essence of the true Dignity of Man. A truly Worthy Person is a person whom one cannot help but respect; with all his manifestations he evokes respect, reverence, approval, and love.

- this is the one who implements these spiritual principles in his life and they are embodied in himself in the knowledge of the corresponding beliefs and personal qualities such as honor, honesty, etc.

To paraphrase, morality can be defined as follows. – this is the conformity of ideas, beliefs, values, actions and all manifestations of a person with moral norms, universal human values ​​(kindness, non-violence, honesty, respect, etc.), and ideally with all Spiritual Laws.

It is Morality that is an indicator of the degree of spirituality of a Person and Society. What is Spirituality - .

Morality and the morality it generates (rules of conduct, etc.) were previously formed by Religion, commandments (Spiritual Laws in a religious interpretation), but are now largely destroyed. Of course, it needs to be revived and formed purposefully.

What is the basis of Morality? What gives birth to morality and what destroys it

The basis of morality is the distinction between and and the choice of the path of Good. About whether Good and Evil exist -. It is the understanding of what is Good, what is considered Worthy, and what is Bad, what is unworthy, shameful, unacceptable for a Man, that determines moral standards.

It is precisely because of the lack of adequate ideas about Good and Evil in modern society that morality is in decline, people are stricken with vices and ignorance, and society as a whole is rapidly decomposing.

There is also a misconception that Morality is a set of restrictions that encroach on a person’s freedom, restrain and block the manifestation of his individuality. This is huge stupidity! Morality provides the vector, path and conditions for upward movement under which a person can grow, develop at the greatest speed, be protected from vices, possible moral decay and degradation, and be invulnerable to evil. It was during the highest periods of spiritual flourishing, when the moral standard was realized to the maximum extent in society, in the upbringing of personnel, citizens, in culture, education, in the traditions of society, that the great empires and states reached their highest level of development, civilization, culture, to which even Many modern states still have a long way to go.

The poem is not just malicious, but somehow sharply self-critical. Or rather, it was not at all justifiable to the moral society of the time when Nekrasov worked. And it seems that everything in this work is clear and, moreover, everything in it is correct.

If you look from the outside, the husband saved the family from shame by exposing his wife in treason, gave his daughter a brilliant future by marrying her to a wealthy adult, and the debt is worth paying, no matter how close a friend you are.

It would seem that everything is correct, what’s wrong with that, as long as a person follows a moral approach to life. He’s not a killer, he just wants to do what he thinks will be good for everyone. But for some reason his wife dies from shame, his daughter dies from an unequal marriage, the peasant whom he brought into the public suddenly drowned himself, a friend, imprisoned for non-payment of a debt, dies. What are they doing? Still right, still right. The actions of a person of moral integrity could not lead to such results. But…

After each part of the poem it is repeated like a mantra: “I have never done harm to anyone in my life.” This sounds both like conviction and justification. Indeed, it is not he who is to blame for their misfortunes, but they themselves.

After all, there was no need to change so as not to die of shame. There was no need to fall in love with just anyone, so as not to die of consumption in a rich family, there was no need to quarrel with the master and then drown himself. And in the end, there was no need to borrow, so as not to pay it back later and end up in prison. This person sincerely believes that he did no harm.

All his actions, according to his logic, brought only salvation and made the lives of the people themselves as better as possible. What's wrong here? He simply acted in a way that benefited only him. Saved himself from shame and from being called a “cuckold” by society.

He saved his daughter from a miserable existence and saved his wallet from spending it on his daughter’s needs. He trained his peasant to be a cook and began to eat well, but he could not restrain himself and tried to teach the man to speak well. And, in the end, he tried to get back what was his. That is, it turned out that these people brought themselves to a critical state and he had nothing to do with their deaths.

Nekrasov speaks again and again in his poems about the moral principles of that time. He exposes those who, under the guise of morality, do evil, accuses such “quiet scoundrels” of meanness, arrogance and, oddly enough, immorality.

Nikolai Nekrasov - Moral Man: Verse

Living according to strict morals,

In the evening I went to my lover;
And he convicted... He called out: I didn’t fight!
Tormented by shame and sadness...
Living according to strict morals,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

And she married a gray-haired rich man.
Their house was brilliant and full like a cup;

Living according to strict morals,

I gave the peasant as a cook:
But he often left the yard

Fatherly flogged him with a canal,
He drowned himself: he was crazy!
Living according to strict morals,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I hinted to him in a friendly way,
I left it to the law to judge us:


Living according to strict morals,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

Nikolai Nekrasov - Living in accordance with strict morality (A moral person)

I have never done harm to anyone in my life.
My wife, covering her face with a veil,
No. 4 In the evening I went to see my lover.
I sneaked into his house with the police
And he caught it. He called - I didn’t fight!
She went to bed and died
No. 8 Tormented by shame and sadness.
Living according to strict morals,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

My friend did not present the debt to me on time.
No. 12 I, having hinted in a friendly way to him,

The law sentenced him to prison.
He died in it without paying altyn,
No. 16 But I’m not angry, even though I have a reason to be angry!
I forgave him the debt on the same date,
Honoring him with tears and sadness.
Living according to strict morals,
No. 20 I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I gave the peasant as a cook,
It was a success; a good cook is happiness!
But he often left the yard
No. 24 And I call it an indecent addiction
Had: loved to read and reason.
I, tired of threatening and scolding,
Fatherly flogged him with a canal;
No. 28 He drowned himself, he was crazy!
Living according to strict morals,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I had a daughter; fell in love with the teacher
No. 32 And she wanted to run away with him rashly.
I threatened her with a curse: she resigned herself
And she married a gray-haired rich man.

No. 36 But Masha suddenly began to turn pale and fade away
And a year later she died of consumption,
Overwhelming the whole house with deep sadness.
Living according to strict morals,
No. 40 I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

Nravstvenny chelovek

Zhivya soglasno s strictoy moralyu,

Zhena moya, zakryv litso vualyu,
Pod vecherok k lyubovniku poshla.
Ya v dom k nemu s politsiyey prokralsya
I ulichil. On vyzval - ya ne dralsya!
Ona slegla v postel i died,
Isterzana pozorom i sadyu.

Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Priatel v srok mne dolga ne predstavil.
Ya, nameknuv po-druzheski yemu,
Zakonu rassudit nas predostavil;
Zakon prigovoril yego v tyurmu.
V ney died on, ne zaplativ altyna,
No ya ne zlyus, khot zlitsya yest prichina!
Ya long yemu prostil togo zh chisla,
Pochtiv yego slezami i sadyu.
Zhivya soglasno s strogoyu moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Krestyanina ya otdal v povara,
On udalsya; khoroshy povar - schastye!
No often otluchalsya so dvora
I zvanyu neprilichnoye pristrastye
Imel: lyubil chitat i rassuzhdat.
Ya, utomyas grozit i raspekat,
Otecheski posek yego, kanalyu;
On vzyal da utopilsya, dur nashla!
Zhivya soglasno s strogoyu moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Imel ya doch; v uchitelya vlyubilas
I s nim bezhat khotela sgoryacha.
Ya pogrozil proklyatyem yey: smirilas
I vyshla za sedogo bogacha.
I dom blestyashch i polon byl kak chasha;
No stala vdrug blednet i gasnut Masha
I cherez god v chakhotke died,
Sraziv ves dom glubokoyu sadyu.
Zhivya soglasno s strogoyu moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Yhfdcndtyysq xtkjdtr

;bdz cjukfcyj c cnhjujq vjhfkm/,

;tyf vjz, pfrhsd kbwj defkm/,
Gjl dtxthjr r k/,jdybre gjikf/
Z d ljv r ytve c gjkbwbtq ghjrhfkcz
B ekbxbk/// Jy dspdfk - z yt lhfkcz!
Jyf cktukf d gjcntkm b evthkf,
Bcnthpfyf gjpjhjv b gtxfkm////

Z ybrjve yt cltkfk d ;bpyb pkf/

Ghbzntkm d chjr vyt ljkuf yt ghtlcnfdbk/
Z, yfvtryed gj-lhe;tcrb tve,
Pfrjye hfccelbnm yfc ghtljcnfdbk;
Pfrjy ghbujdjhbk tuj d n/hmve/
D ytq evth jy, yt pfgkfnbd fknsyf,
Yj z yt pk/cm, )