How to make a source of electricity from a magnet. Obtaining electrical energy from the magnetic field of permanent magnets. Practical schemes of free energy generators

Exists a large number of devices related to the so-called "". Among them, there are numerous designs of current generators that make it possible to obtain electricity from a magnet. These devices use the properties of permanent magnets capable of performing external useful work.

Currently, work is underway to create a device that can drive a device that generates current. Research in this area is not yet fully completed, however, based on the results obtained, one can fully imagine its structure and principle of operation.

How to get electricity from a magnet

In order to understand how such devices work, you need to know exactly how they differ from conventional ones. electric motors. All electric motors, although they use the magnetic properties of materials, carry out their movement solely under the influence of current.

For the operation of a real magnetic motor, only the constant energy of the magnets is used, with the help of which all the necessary movements are performed. The main problem with these devices is the tendency of the magnets to static equilibrium. Therefore, the creation of a variable attraction comes to the fore, using physical properties magnets or mechanical devices in the motor itself.

The principle of operation of a permanent magnet motor is based on the torque of repulsive forces. There is an action of the same magnetic fields of permanent magnets located in the stator and rotor. Their movement is carried out in the opposite direction with respect to each other. In order to solve the problem of attraction, a copper conductor with an electric current passed through it was used. Such a conductor begins to be attracted to the magnet, but in the absence of current, the attraction stops. As a result, cyclic attraction and repulsion of the stator and rotor parts is provided.

The main types of magnetic motors

Over the entire period of research, a large number of devices have been developed that make it possible to obtain electricity from a magnet. Each of them has its own technology, but all models are united. Among them, there are no ideal perpetual motion machines, since magnets completely lose their qualities after a certain time.

The simplest device is the Lorentz anti-gravitational magnetic engine. Its design includes two disks with opposite charges connected to the power supply. Half of these disks are placed in a hemispherical magnetic screen, after which their gradual rotation begins.

The simplest design of the Lazarev rotary ring is considered the most real functioning device. It consists of a container, which is divided in half by a special porous partition or ceramic disc. A tube is installed inside the disk, and the container itself is filled with liquid. First, the liquid enters the bottom of the container, and then, under the influence of pressure, the perspiration of the tube begins to move upward. Here the liquid begins to drip from the bent end of the tube and again enters the lower part of the container. In order for this structure to take the form of an engine, a wheel with blades is located under the drops of liquid.

Magnets are installed directly on the blades, forming a magnetic field. The rotation of the wheel accelerates, the water is pumped faster and, in the end, a certain maximum speed of the entire device is set.

basis linear motor Shkondina is a system of location of one wheel in another wheel. The whole structure consists of a double pair of coils with opposite magnetic fields. Due to this, their movement is ensured in different directions.

Perendev's alternative motor uses only magnetic energy. The design consists of two circles - dynamic and static. Magnets are located on each of them with the same sequence and intervals. The free force of self-repulsion sets the inner circle into infinite motion.

The use of permanent magnet devices

The results of research in this area already make us think about the prospects for the use of magnetic devices.

In the future, there will be no need for all kinds of chargers. Instead they will be used magnetic motors most different sizes that drive miniature current generators. Thus, many laptops, tablets, smartphones and other similar equipment will work continuously for a long time. These power supplies will be swappable from old models to new ones.

Magnetic devices with higher power will be able to rotate such generators that will replace the equipment of modern power plants. They can easily work instead of internal combustion engines. An individual power supply system will be installed in each apartment or house.

Universal use of electricity in all areas human activity associated with the search for free electricity. Because of what, a new milestone in the development of electrical engineering was an attempt to create a generator free energy, which would significantly reduce the cost or reduce to zero the cost of obtaining electricity. The most promising source for the implementation of this problem is free energy.

What is free energy?

The term free energy arose at the time of the large-scale introduction and operation of internal combustion engines, when the problem of obtaining electric current directly depended on the coal, wood or oil products spent for this. Therefore, free energy is understood as such a force, for the production of which there is no need to burn fuel and, accordingly, to spend any resources.

The first attempts to scientifically substantiate the possibility of obtaining free energy were founded by Helmholtz, Gibbs and Tesla. The first of them developed the theory of creating a system in which the generated electricity must be equal to or greater than that spent for the initial start-up, that is, obtaining a perpetual motion machine. Gibbs suggested the possibility of obtaining energy by flowing chemical reaction so long that it is enough for a full power supply. Tesla observed energy in all natural phenomena and expressed the theory of the presence of ether - a substance that permeates everything around us.

Today you can observe the implementation of these principles for obtaining free energy in. Some of them have long been at the service of mankind and help to receive alternative energy from wind, sun, rivers, tides and tides. These are the same solar panels, hydroelectric power plants that helped to harness the forces of nature, which are freely available. But along with already justified and implemented free energy generators, there are concepts of fuelless engines that try to circumvent the law of conservation of energy.

The problem of conservation of energy

The main stumbling block in getting free electricity is the law of conservation of energy. Due to the presence of electrical resistance in the generator itself, connecting wires and other elements electrical network, according to the laws of physics, there is a loss of output power. Energy is consumed and its replenishment requires constant replenishment from the outside, or the generation system must create such an excess electrical energy enough to power the load and keep the generator running. From a mathematical point of view, a free energy generator should have an efficiency of more than 1, which does not fit into the framework of standard physical phenomena.

Diagram and design of the Tesla generator

Nikola Tesla became the discoverer of physical phenomena and created on their basis many electrical devices, for example, Tesla transformers, which are used by mankind to this day. Throughout the history of his activity, he has patented thousands of inventions, among which there is more than one free energy generator.

Rice. 1: Tesla Free Energy Generator

Look at Figure 1, here is the principle of generating electricity using a free energy generator assembled from Tesla coils. This device involves obtaining energy from the ether, for which the coils included in its composition are tuned to resonant frequency. To obtain energy from the surrounding space in this system, the following geometric relationships must be observed:

• winding diameter;
• wire sections for each of the windings;
• distance between coils.

Known today various options the use of Tesla coils in the design of other free energy generators. However, no significant results of their application have yet been achieved. Although some inventors claim the opposite, and keep the result of their developments in the strictest confidence, demonstrating only the final effect of the generator. In addition to this model, other inventions of Nikola Tesla are known, which are generators of free energy.

Magnetic free energy generator

The effect of the interaction of a magnetic field and a coil is widely used in. And in a free energy generator, this principle is used not to rotate a magnetized shaft by supplying electrical impulses to the windings, but to supply a magnetic field to an electric coil.

The impetus for the development of this direction was the effect obtained by applying voltage to an electromagnet (a coil wound on a magnetic circuit). At the same time, nearby permanent magnet is attracted to the ends of the magnetic circuit and remains attracted even after the power is removed from the coil. A permanent magnet creates a constant flux of a magnetic field in the core, which will hold the structure until it is torn off by physical force. This effect was applied in the creation of a permanent magnet free energy generator circuit.

Look at Figure 2, to create such a free energy generator and power the load from it, it is necessary to form an electromagnetic interaction system, which consists of:

• starting coil (I);
• locking coil (IV);
• supply coil (II);
• support coil (III).

The circuit also includes a control transistor VT, a capacitor C, diodes VD, a limiting resistor R and a load Z H.

This free energy generator is turned on by pressing the "Start" button, after which the control pulse is applied through VD6 and R6 to the base of the transistor VT1. When a control pulse arrives, the transistor opens and closes the current flow circuit through the starting coils I. After that electricity will flow through the coils I and excite the magnetic circuit, which will attract a permanent magnet. The magnetic field lines will flow along the closed circuit of the magnet core and the permanent magnet.

EMF is induced from the flowing magnetic flux in coils II, III, IV. Electrical potential from the IV coil is fed to the base of the transistor VT1, creating a control signal. The EMF in coil III is designed to maintain the magnetic flux in the magnetic circuits. The EMF in coil II provides power to the load.

The stumbling block in the practical implementation of such a free energy generator is the creation of a variable magnetic flux. To do this, it is recommended to install two circuits with permanent magnets in the circuit, in which the lines of force have the opposite direction.

In addition to the above free energy generator on magnets, today there are a number of similar devices designed by Searle, Adams and other developers, the generation of which is based on the use of a constant magnetic field.

Followers of Nikola Tesla and their generators

The seeds of incredible inventions sown by Tesla created in the minds of applicants an unquenchable thirst to translate into reality the fantastic ideas of creating a perpetual motion machine and send mechanical generators to the dusty shelf of history. The most famous inventors used the principles set forth by Nikola Tesla in their devices. Consider the most popular of them.

Lester Hendershot

Hendershot developed a theory about the possibility of using the Earth's magnetic field to generate electricity. Leicester presented the first models back in the 1930s, but they were never in demand by his contemporaries. Structurally, the Hendershot generator consists of two counter-wound coils, two transformers, capacitors and a movable solenoid.

The operation of such a free energy generator is possible only with its strict orientation from north to south, therefore, a compass must be used to set up the work. Coils are wound on wooden bases with multidirectional winding to reduce the effect of mutual induction (when an EMF is induced in them, the EMF will not be induced in the opposite direction). In addition, the coils must be tuned by a resonant circuit.

John Bedini

Bedini introduced his free energy generator in 1984, a feature of the patented device was an energizer - a device with a constant torque that does not lose momentum. This effect was achieved by installing several permanent magnets on the disk, which, when interacting with the electromagnetic coil, create impulses in it and repel from the ferromagnetic base. Due to this, the free energy generator received the effect of self-feeding.

Later Bedini generators became known through a school experiment. The model turned out to be much simpler and did not represent something grandiose, but it was able to perform the functions of a generator free electricity about 9 days without outside help.

Look at Figure 4, here is a schematic diagram of the free energy generator of that same school project. It uses the following elements:

• a rotating disk with several permanent magnets (energizer);
• a coil with a ferromagnetic base and two windings;
• battery (in this example it has been replaced with a 9V battery);
• control unit of a transistor (T), resistor (R) and diode (D);
• current collection is organized from an additional coil that feeds the LED, but it is also possible to supply power from the battery circuit.

With the start of rotation, permanent magnets create a magnetic excitation in the core of the coil, which induces an EMF in the windings of the output coils. Due to the direction of the turns in the starting winding, the current begins to flow, as shown in the figure below through starting winding, resistor and diode.

When the magnet is directly above the solenoid, the core is saturated and the stored energy becomes sufficient to open the transistor T. When the transistor is opened, the current begins to flow in the working winding, which recharges the battery.

The energy at this stage becomes sufficient to magnetize the ferromagnetic core from the working winding, and it receives the pole of the same name with a magnet located above it. Thanks to the magnetic pole in the core, the magnet on the spinning wheel is repelled from this pole and accelerates the further movement of the energizer. With the acceleration of the movement, the pulses in the windings occur more and more often, and the LED switches from a flashing mode to a constant glow mode.

Alas, such a free energy generator is not a perpetual motion machine; in practice, it allowed the system to work ten times longer than it could operate on a single battery, but eventually it stops anyway.

Tariel Kapanadze

Kapanadze developed a model of his free energy generator in the 80-90s of the last century. mechanical device was based on the work of an improved Tesla coil, as the author himself claimed, compact generator could feed consumers with a power of 5 kW. In the 2000s, the Kapanadze generator industrial scale they tried to build a 100 kW in Turkey, according to the technical characteristics, it needed only 2 kW for start-up and operation.

The figure above shows a schematic diagram of a free energy generator, but the main parameters of the circuit remain a trade secret.

Practical schemes of free energy generators

Despite the large number of existing schemes of free energy generators, very few of them can boast real results that could be tested and repeated at home.

Figure 8 above is a free energy generator circuit that you can replicate at home. This principle was stated by Nikola Tesla, for his work is used metal plate, isolated from the ground and located on some hill. The plate is a receiver of electromagnetic oscillations in the atmosphere, this includes a fairly wide range of radiation (solar, radio magnetic waves, static electricity from the movement of air masses, etc.)

The receiver is connected to one of the capacitor plates, and the second plate is grounded, which creates the required potential difference. The only stumbling block to its industrial implementation is the need to isolate the plate on a hill large area to feed at least a private house.

Modern look and new developments

Despite widespread interest in the creation of a free energy generator, to oust from the market classic way they still can't get electricity. The developers of the past, who put forward bold theories about a significant reduction in the cost of electricity, lacked the technical perfection of the equipment or the parameters of the elements could not provide the desired effect. And thanks to scientific and technological progress, humanity receives more and more new inventions that make the embodiment of a free energy generator already tangible. It should be noted that today free energy generators operating on the power of the sun and wind have already been received and actively operated.

But, at the same time, on the Internet you can find offers to purchase such devices, although for the most part these are dummies created to deceive an ignorant person. And a small percentage of really working free energy generators, whether on resonant transformers, coils or permanent magnets, can only cope with the power supply of low-power consumers, provide electricity, for example, a private house or lighting in the yard they can't. Free Energy Generators – promising direction, but they practical implementation still not implemented.

In this article, we will consider the model powerful generator from magnets, which is capable of generating electricity with a power of 300 watts. The frame is assembled from dural plates 10 mm thick. The generator consists of 3 main parts: housing, rotor, stator. The main purpose of the housing is to fix the rotor and stator in a strictly defined position. The rotating rotor must not touch the stator coils with magnets. The duralumin case is assembled from 4 parts. The angular layout provides a simple and rigid structure. The body is made on a CNC machine. This is both a plus and a disadvantage of the development, since for a high-quality repetition of the model, you need to find specialists and a CNC machine. The diameter of the discs is 100 mm.

You can also take a ready-made electric generator in the online store.

The rotor of the electric generator I. Belitsky

Rotor is an iron axle. On it are fixed 2 iron disks with neodymium magnets located on them. An iron bushing is pressed between the discs on the axle. Its length depends on the thickness of the stator. Its purpose is to provide a minimum gap between the rotating magnets and the stator coils. Each disk contains 12 neodymium magnets with a diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 5 mm. For them seats are made on a disk.

They need to be glued with epoxy or other glue. In this case, it is necessary to strictly observe the polarity. In the assembled state, the magnets should be located so that opposite each is another from the opposite disk. In this case, the poles must be different towards each other. As the author of the development himself writes (Igor Beletsky): “It will be right to have different poles, so that the lines of force come out of one and enter the other, definitely S = N.” You can buy neodymium magnets in a Chinese online store.

Stator device

Sheet textolite 12 m thick was used as a base. Holes for coils and rotor bushings were made in the sheet. The outer diameter of the iron coils that are installed in these holes is 25 mm. The inner diameter is equal to the diameter of the magnets (15 mm). Coils perform 2 tasks: the function of a magnetically conductive core and the task of reducing sticking when moving from one coil to another.

Coils are made from insulated wire 0.5 mm thick. 130 turns are wound on each coil. The direction of winding is the same for all.

When creating a powerful generator from, you need to know that the higher the speed that can be provided, the higher the output voltage and current of the device will be for free energy.

Many people are trying to implement the idea embodied in the device described below. Its essence is as follows: there is a permanent magnet (PM) - a hypothetical energy source, an output coil (collector) and a modulator that changes the distribution of the PM magnetic field, thereby creating a variable magnetic flux in the coil.
Implementation (18.08.2004)
To implement this project (let's call it TEG, as a derivative of two designs: Floyd Sweet's VTA and Tom Bearden's MEG 🙂), I took two ferrite ring cores of the M2000NM brand with dimensions of O40xO25x11 mm, put them together, fastened with electrical tape, and wound the collector (output) winding along the perimeter of the core - 105 turns with PEV-1 wire in 6 layers, also securing each layer with electrical tape.

Next, we wrap it again with electrical tape and wind the modulator coil (input) on top. We wind it as usual - toroidal. I wound 400 turns in two PEV-0.3 wires, i.e. it turned out two windings of 400 turns. This was done in order to expand the variants of the experiment.

Now we place this whole system between two magnets. In my case, these were barium oxide magnets, material grade M22RA220-1, magnetized in a magnetic field with a strength of at least 640,000 A / m,
dimensions 80x60x16 mm. The magnets were taken from a magnetic-discharge diode pump NMD 0.16-1 or the like. The magnets are oriented "at attraction" and their magnetic lines penetrate the ferrite rings along the axis.

TEG assembly (diagram).

The work of the TEG is as follows. Initially, the magnetic field strength inside the collector coil is higher than outside due to the presence of ferrite inside. If you saturate the core, then it
the magnetic permeability will decrease sharply, which will lead to a decrease in the tension inside the collector coil. Those. we need to create such a current in the modulating coil in order to saturate the core. By the time the core is saturated, the voltage across the collector coil will increase. When the voltage is removed from the control coil, the field strength will increase again, which will lead to a reverse polarity surge at the output. The idea in the stated form was born somewhere in the middle of February 2004.

In principle, one modulator coil is sufficient. Control block
assembled according to the classical scheme on TL494. Upper scheme variable
the resistor changes the duty cycle of the pulses from 0 to about 45% on each
channel, lower - sets the frequency in the range from about 150 Hz to 20
kHz. When using one channel, the frequency, respectively,
is reduced by half. The circuit also provides for current protection through
modulator at about 5A.

TEG assembled (appearance).

TEG parameters (measured with multimeter MY-81):
winding resistance:
collector - 0.5 Ohm
modulators - 11.3 ohms and 11.4 ohms

collector - 1.16 mH
modulators - 628 mH and 627 mH

collector - 1.15 mH
modulators - 375 mH and 374 mH
Experiment No. 1 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are connected in series, so it looks like a bifilar. One generator channel was used. The inductance of the modulator is 1.52 H, the resistance is 22.7 ohms. Control box power
here and below 15 V, the oscillograms were taken with a two-beam oscilloscope C1-55. The first channel (lower beam) is connected through a 1:20 divider (Cin 17 pF, Rin 1 MΩ), the second channel (upper beam) is connected directly (Cin 40 pF, Rin 1 MΩ). There is no load in the collector circuit.
The first thing that was noticed was that after removing the pulse from the control coil, resonant oscillations occur in it, and if the next pulse is applied at the moment of antiphase to the resonant surge,
then at this moment there is a pulse at the output of the collector. Also, this phenomenon was noticed without magnets, but to a much lesser extent. That is, let's say, in this case, the steepness of the potential change on the winding is important. The pulse amplitude at the output could reach 20 V. However, the current of such surges is very small, and it is difficult to charge a 100 μF capacitance connected to the output through a rectifier bridge. The output does not pull any other load. At a high frequency of the generator, when the modulator current is extremely small, and the shape of the voltage pulses on it retains rectangular shape, emissions are also present at the output, although the magnetic circuit is still very far from saturation.

Conclusions:
So far, nothing significant has happened. Let's just take a look at some of the effects. 🙂
Here, I think it would be fair to note that there is at least one other person - a certain Sergey A, who is experimenting with the same system. I swear, we came up with this idea completely independently :). How far his research went, I do not know, I did not contact him. But he also noted similar effects.
Experiment No. 2 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are disconnected and connected to two channels of the generator, and are connected in opposite directions, i.e. alternately creates a magnetic flux in the ring in different directions. Coil inductances are given above in TEG parameters. The measurements were carried out as in the previous experiment. There is no load on the collector.
The oscillograms below show the voltage on one of the modulator windings and the current through the modulator (left) and also the voltage on the modulator winding and the voltage at the collector output (right) at
different pulse durations. I will not indicate the amplitudes and temporal characteristics for now, firstly, I did not save them all, and secondly, this is not important yet, while we try to qualitatively track the behavior of the system.

The duty cycle of the pulses on the channel is about 11%, i.e. general - 22%.

The pulse duty cycle on the channel is 17.5%, the total is 35%.

Removed one magnet.

Removed both magnets.

When removing one magnet, the output amplitude decreased by almost 2 times. We also note that the frequency of oscillations has decreased, since the inductance of the modulators has increased. When removing the second magnet,
there is no output signal.
Conclusions:
It seems that the idea, in the form in which it was laid down, is working.
Experiment No. 3 (19.08.2004)
The modulator coils are again connected in series, as in the 1st experiment. Counter serial connection absolutely no effect. I did not expect anything else :). Connected properly. The work is checked both in idle mode and with load. The oscillograms below show the modulator current (upper beam) and the output voltage (lower beam) at various pulse durations on the modulator. Here and below, I decided to be tied to the current of the modulators,
as to the most suitable as a reference signal. Oscillograms were taken relatively common wire. The first 3 figures are in idle mode, the last one is with load.

Figures from left to right and from top to bottom: 1) short pulse duration, 2) increase in duration with approach to the saturation region, 3) optimal duration, full saturation and maximum output
voltage (at no load), 4) last operating mode, but with connected load.
The load was an incandescent lamp 6.3 V, 0.22 A. Of course, this cannot be called a glow ... 🙂

Power measurements in the load were not carried out, something else is interesting:

Conclusions:
I don't know what to think… Consumption decreased by 0.3%. The generator itself without TEG consumes 18.5 mA. Perhaps the load indirectly through a change in the distribution of the magnetic field affected the inductance
modulators. Although, if we compare the waveforms of the current through the modulator in idle mode and with a load (for example, when scrolling back and forth in ACDSee), then we can notice a slight blockage of the peak top when working with
load. An increase in the inductance would lead to a decrease in the peak width. Although all this is very illusory ...
Experiment No. 4 (20.08.2004)
The goal is set: to get the maximum output on what is. In the last experiment, I ran into the frequency limit at which the optimal pulse duration was provided at the maximum possible pulse filling level of ~ 45% (duty cycle is minimal). So it was necessary to reduce the inductance of the modulator winding (previously two were connected in series), but in this case
you have to increase the current. So now the modulator coils are connected separately to both outputs of the generator, as in the 2nd experiment, however this time they are connected in one direction (as indicated in
generator circuit diagram). At the same time, the oscillograms changed (they were taken relative to the common wire). They look much nicer :). In addition, we now have two windings that work alternately. So for the same maximum pulse duration, we can double the frequency (for this circuit).
A certain mode of operation of the generator is selected according to the maximum brightness of the lamp at the output. So, as usual, let's move on to the drawings ...

The upper beam is the modulator current. The bottom left is the voltage on one of the modulators, on the right is the control pulse of the same channel from the TL494 output.

Here, on the left, we clearly see an increase in the voltage on the modulator winding during the operation of the second one (the second half-cycle, logical "0" on the right waveform). Emissions when the modulator is turned off at 60 volts are limited by diodes that are part of the field switches.

The upper beam is the modulator current. Bottom left - output voltage with load, right - output voltage at idle.

The load is the same lamp 6.3 V, 0.22 A. And the picture with consumption is repeated again ...

Again we have a decrease in consumption with a load connected to the collector. The measurements are of course at the threshold of the accuracy of the device, but, nevertheless, the repeatability is 100%. The power in the load was about 156
mW. At the input - 9.15 watts. And so far no one has talked about the “perpetual motion machine” 🙂
Here you can admire the burning light bulb:

Conclusions:
The effect is obvious. What we can get from this - time will tell. What should you pay attention to? First, increase the number of turns of the collector, perhaps by adding a couple more rings, but it would be better to choose
optimal dimensions magnetic circuit. Who would do the math? 😉 Perhaps it makes sense to increase the magnetic permeability of the magnetic circuit. This should increase the difference in magnetic field strengths inside and outside the coil. At the same time, the inductance of the modulator would be reduced. It was also thought that gaps were needed between the ring and the magnet, so that, let's say, there was room for bending magnetic lines when changing the properties of the medium - magnetic permeability. However, in practice, this only leads to a voltage drop at the output. At the moment, the gaps are determined by 3 layers of electrical tape and the thickness of the modulator winding, by eye this is a maximum of 1.5 mm on each side.
Experiment No. 4.1 (08/21/2004)
The previous experiments were carried out at work. Brought the control unit and "transformer" home. I had the same set of magnets lying around at home for a long time. Collected. I was surprised to find that I can raise the frequency even more. Apparently my "home" magnets were a little stronger, as a result of which the inductance of the modulators decreased. The radiators were already getting hotter, but the current consumption of the circuit was 0.56 A and 0.55 A without load and with load, respectively, with the same 15 V power supply. There may have been a through current through the keys. In this scheme, at high frequency, this is not excluded. I connected a 2.5 V, 0.3A halogen bulb to the output. The load received 1.3 V, 200 mA. Total input 8.25 W, output 0.26 W - efficiency 3.15%. But note, again without the expected traditional influence on the source!
Experiment No. 5 (08/26/2004)
A new transducer (version 1.2) was assembled on a ring with a higher permeability — М10000НМ, the dimensions are the same: O40xO25x11 mm. Unfortunately, there was only one ring. To fit more turns on the collector winding, the wire is taken thinner. Total: a collector of 160 turns with a wire O 0.3 and also two modulators of 235 turns each, also with a wire O 0.3. A new power supply was also found up to 100 V and a current of up to 1.2 A. The supply voltage can also play a role, since it provides the rate of current rise through the modulator, and that, in turn, the rate of change of the magnetic flux, which is directly related with the amplitude of the output voltage.
So far there is nothing to measure the inductance and capture pictures. Therefore, without frills, I will state the bare figures. Several measurements were taken at different voltages power supply and operating modes of the generator. Below are some of them.
without reaching full saturation

Input: 20V x 0.3A = 6W
Efficiency: 3.6%

Input: 10V x 0.6A = 6W
Output: 9V x 24mA = 0.216W
Efficiency: 3.6% Input: 15V x 0.5A = 7.5W
Output: 11V x 29mA = 0.32W
Efficiency: 4.2%
with full saturation

Input: 15V x 1.2A = 18W
Output: 16V x 35mA = 0.56W
Efficiency: 3.1%
Conclusions:
It turned out that in the full saturation mode, there is a decrease in efficiency, since the modulator current increases sharply. Optimal mode work (in terms of efficiency) was achieved at a supply voltage of 15 V. No load effect on the power supply was detected. For the 3rd example given with an efficiency of 4.2, the circuit current with the load connected should increase by about 20 mA, but the increase was also not recorded.
Experiment No. 6 (2.09.2004)
Some of the modulator turns have been removed in order to increase the frequency and reduce the gaps between the ring and the magnet. Now we have two modulator windings of 118 turns wound in one layer. The collector is left unchanged - 160 turns. In addition, measured electrical characteristics new converter.

TEG parameters (version 1.21), measured with multimeter MY-81:
winding resistance:
collector - 8.9 Ohm
modulators - 1.5 Ohm each
winding inductance without magnets:
collector - 3.37 mH
modulators - 133.4 mH each
serially connected modulators - 514 mH
winding inductance with installed magnets:
collector - 3.36 mH
modulators - 89.3 mH each
serially connected modulators - 357 mH
Below I present the results of two measurements of the TEG operation in different modes. With more high voltage supply modulation frequency is higher. In both cases, the modulators are connected in series.

Input: 15V x 0.55A = 8.25W
Output: 1.88V x 123mA = 0.231W
Efficiency: 2.8%

Input: 19.4V x 0.81A = 15.714W
Output: 3.35V x 176mA = 0.59W
Efficiency: 3.75%
Conclusions:
The first and the saddest. After making changes to the modulator, an increase in consumption was recorded when working with a new converter. In the second case, the consumption increased by about 30 mA. Those. without load, the consumption was 0.78 A, with a load - 0.81 A. We multiply by the supply 19.4 V and we get 0.582 W - the same power that was removed from the output. However, I will repeat with all responsibility that this has not been observed before. When the load is connected, in this case, a steeper increase in the current through the modulator is clearly seen, which is a consequence of a decrease in the modulator inductance. What this is connected with is not yet known.
And another fly in the ointment. I am afraid that in this configuration it will not be possible to obtain an efficiency of more than 5% due to the weak overlap of the magnetic field. In other words, by saturating the core, we weaken the field inside the collector coil only in the area where this very core passes. But the magnetic lines coming from the center of the magnet through the center of the coil do not overlap. Moreover, part of the magnetic lines "displaced" from the core when it is saturated also bypasses the latter with inside rings. Those. in this way, only a small part of the PM magnetic flux is modulated. It is necessary to change the geometry of the entire system. Perhaps we should expect some increase in efficiency, using ring magnets from the speakers. The idea of ​​modulators operating in resonance mode does not let go either. However, under conditions of core saturation and, accordingly, constantly changing inductance of modulators, this is not easy to do.
Research continues...
If you want to discuss, go to the "passionate forum" - my nickname Armer.
Or write to [email protected], but I think it's better in the forum.

x x x
Dragons' Lord: First, a huge thank you to Armer for providing a report of his experiments with great illustrations. I think that soon we will see new works by Vladislav. In the meantime, I will express my thoughts on this project and its possible way improvements. I propose to change the generator circuit as follows:

Instead of flat external magnets (plates), it is proposed to use ring magnets. Moreover, the inner diameter of the magnet should be approximately equal to the same diameter of the magnetic circuit ring, and the outer diameter of the magnet is greater than the outer diameter of the magnetic circuit ring.
What is the problem with low efficiency? The problem is that the magnetic lines being forced out of the magnetic circuit still cross the area of ​​the turns. secondary winding(Pressed out and concentrated in the central area). The specified ratio of the rings creates asymmetry and forces most magnetic lines, with the central magnetic circuit saturated to the limit, go around it in the OUTER space. In the inner region, there will be fewer magnetic lines than in the base case. In fact, this "disease" cannot be completely cured by still using the rings. How to increase the overall efficiency is described below.
It is also proposed to use an additional external magnetic circuit, which concentrates the power
lines in the working area of ​​the device, making it more powerful (here it is important not to overdo it, because we use the idea of ​​​​fully saturating the central core). Structurally, the external magnetic circuit is a turned ferromagnetic parts of axisymmetric geometry (something like a pipe with flanges). You can see the horizontal line of the connector of the upper and lower "cups" in the picture. Or, it can be discrete independent magnetic circuits (brackets).
Further, it is worth thinking about improving the process from an “electrical” point of view. Clearly, the first thing to do is to swing the primary circuit into resonance. After all, we have no harmful feedback from the secondary circuit. It is proposed to use the CURRENT resonance for obvious reasons (after all, the goal is to saturate the core). The second remark, perhaps, is not so obvious at first glance. It is proposed to use not the standard solenoid winding of the coil as a secondary winding, but to make several flat bifilar Tesla coils and place them on the outer diameter of the magnetic circuit in a “puff pastry”, connecting them in series. In order to generally remove the existing minimal interaction with each other in the axial direction of adjacent bifilar coils, you need to connect them also THROUGH ONE, returning from the last to the second (reusing the meaning of the bifilar).
Thus, due to the maximum potential difference in two adjacent turns, the stored energy of the secondary circuit will be the maximum possible, which is an order of magnitude greater than the variant with a conventional solenoid.
As can be seen from the diagram, in view of the fact that the “pie” of bifilars has a fairly decent length in
horizontal direction - it is proposed to wind the primary not on top of the secondary, but under it. Directly to the magnetic circuit.
As I said, using rings, it is impossible to overcome a certain efficiency limit. And I assure you that there is no smell of super-unity there. The magnetic lines forced out of the central magnetic circuit will
go around it along the surface itself (along the shortest path), thereby, still crossing the area,
limited by turns of the secondary. Design analysis forces us to abandon the current circuitry. You need a central magnetic circuit WITHOUT a hole. Let's take a look at the following diagram:

The main magnetic circuit is assembled from separate plates or rods of rectangular section, and
is a parallelepiped. The primary is placed directly on it. Its axis is horizontal
and looks at us according to the scheme. Secondary, still a “puff pastry” of Tesla bifilars. Now
note that we have introduced an additional (secondary) magnetic circuit, which is a "cup" with
holes in their bottoms. The gap between the edge of the hole and the main central magnetic circuit (primary coil) should be minimal in order to effectively intercept the displaced magnetic lines and pull them towards itself, preventing them from passing through the bifilars. Of course, it should be noted that the magnetic permeability of the central magnetic circuit should be an order of magnitude higher than
auxiliary. For example: the central parallelepiped - 10000, "cups" - 1000. In the normal (not saturated) state, the central core, due to its greater magnetic permeability, will draw magnetic lines into itself.
And now the most interesting 😉 . Let's take a closer look - what did we get? ... And we got the most ordinary MEG, only in the "unfinished" version. In other words, I want to say that the classic
the execution of the MEG v.4.0 generator is a couple of times ahead of our best scheme, in view of its ability to redistribute magnetic lines (swinging “swings”) to remove useful energy throughout the entire cycle of its operation.
Moreover, from both arms of the magnetic circuit. In our case, we have a one-arm design. We simply do not use half of the possible efficiency.
I express the hope that Vladislav will conduct experiments on MEG v.4.0 in the very near future,
moreover, that such a machine (performed by v.3.0) he already has;). And of course, you must
use the resonance of the current on the primary control coils, installed not directly on the arms of the magnetic circuit, but on ferrite inserts-plates, perpendicular to that (into the gap of the magnetic circuit). The report, upon receipt to me, I will immediately make up and provide to our readers.

"Novosibirsk TEG Generator"

The majority of people are convinced that energy for existence can only be obtained from gas, coal or oil. The atom is quite dangerous, the construction of hydroelectric power plants is a very laborious and costly process. Scientists around the world say that natural fuel reserves may soon run out. What to do, where is the way out? Are humanity's days numbered?

Everything from nothing

Research on the types of "green energy" in Lately are being conducted more intensively, as this is the way to the future. Our planet initially has everything for the life of mankind. You just need to be able to take it and use it for good. Many scientists and just amateurs create such devices? as a generator of free energy. With their own hands, following the laws of physics and their own logic, they do what will benefit all of humanity.

So what are the phenomena? Here are a few of them:

• static or radiant natural electricity;
• use of permanent and neodymium magnets;
• receiving heat from mechanical heaters;
• transformation of earth energy and;
• implosion vortex engines;
• thermal solar pumps.

Each of these technologies uses a minimal initial impulse to release more energy.

Free energy with your own hands? For this you need to have desire change your life, a lot of patience, diligence, a little knowledge and, of course, necessary tools and accessories.

Water instead of gasoline? What nonsense!

An engine running on alcohol will probably find more understanding than the idea of ​​decomposing water into oxygen and hydrogen molecules. After all, even in school textbooks it is said that this is a completely unprofitable way of obtaining energy. However, there are already installations for the extraction of hydrogen by ultra-efficient electrolysis. Moreover, the cost of the resulting gas is equal to the cost of cubic meters of water used in this process. Equally important, the cost of electricity is also minimal.

Most likely, in the near future, along with electric vehicles, cars powered by hydrogen fuel will drive around the world's roads. An ultra-efficient electrolysis plant is not exactly a free energy generator. It is quite difficult to assemble it with your own hands. However, the method of continuous production of hydrogen using this technology can be combined with methods for obtaining green energy, which will increase the overall efficiency of the process.

One of the undeservedly forgotten

Devices such as completely maintenance-free. They are absolutely silent and do not pollute the atmosphere. One of the most famous developments in the field of eco-technologies is the principle of obtaining current from the ether according to the theory of N. Tesla. A device consisting of two resonantly tuned transformer coils is a grounded oscillatory circuit. Initially, Tesla made a free energy generator with his own hands in order to transmit a radio signal over long distances.

If we consider the surface layers of the Earth as a huge capacitor, then we can imagine them as a single conductive plate. The second element in this system is the ionosphere (atmosphere) of the planet, saturated with cosmic rays (the so-called ether). Through both of these "plates" are constantly flowing electric charges. To "collect" currents from near space, you need to make a free energy generator with your own hands. 2013 was one of the most productive years in this area. Everyone wants free electricity.

How to make a free energy generator with your own hands

The scheme of a single-phase resonant device N. Tesla consists of the following blocks:

1. Two conventional 12 V batteries.
2. with electrolytic capacitors.
3. Generator that sets the standard frequency of the current (50 Hz).
4. Current amplifier block directed to the output transformer.
5. Converter of low-voltage (12 V) voltage to high-voltage (up to 3000 V).
6. A conventional transformer with a winding ratio of 1:100.
7. Voltage step-up transformer with high-voltage winding and tape core, power up to 30W.
8. Main transformer without core, with double winding.
9. A step-down transformer.
10. Ferrite rod for system grounding.

All units of the installation are connected according to the laws of physics. The system is set up experimentally.

Is it all true?

It may seem that this is absurd, because another year when they tried to create a free energy generator with their own hands is 2014. The circuit described above simply uses battery power, according to many experimenters. To this the following may be objected. Energy enters the closed circuit of the system from the electric field of the output coils, which receive it from a high-voltage transformer due to relative position. And the charge of the battery creates and maintains the strength of the electric field. All other energy comes from the environment.

Fuel-free device for receiving free electricity

It is known that the occurrence of a magnetic field in any engine is facilitated by conventional ones made of copper or aluminum wire. To compensate for the inevitable losses due to the resistance of these materials, the engine must run continuously, using part of the generated energy to maintain its own field. This significantly reduces the efficiency of the device.

In a transformer powered by neodymium magnets, there are no self-induction coils, and, accordingly, there are no losses associated with resistance. When using a constant, they are generated by a rotor rotating in this field.

How to make a small DIY free energy generator

The schema used is:

• take a cooler (fan) from the computer;
• remove 4 transformer coils from it;
• replace with small neodymium magnets;
• orient them in the original directions of the coils;
• by changing the position of the magnets, you can control the speed of rotation of the motor, which works completely without electricity.

This almost retains its performance until one of the magnets is removed from the circuit. By attaching a light bulb to the device, you can illuminate the room for free. If you take a more powerful engine and magnets, you can power not only a light bulb, but also other household electrical appliances from the system.

On the principle of operation of Tariel Kapanadze's installation

This famous do-it-yourself free energy generator (25kW, 100kW) is assembled according to the principle described by Nikolo Tesla back in the last century. This resonant system is capable of producing a voltage many times greater than the initial impulse. It is important to understand that this is not a "perpetual motion machine", but a machine for generating electricity from freely available natural sources.

To obtain a current of 50 Hz, 2 square-wave generators and power diodes are used. For grounding, a ferrite rod is used, which, in fact, closes the Earth's surface to the charge of the atmosphere (ether, according to N. Tesla). Coaxial cable is used to supply a powerful output voltage to the load.

talking in simple terms, do-it-yourself free energy generator (2014, scheme by T. Kapanadze), receives only the initial impulse from a 12 V source. The device is capable of constantly supplying standard electrical appliances, heaters, lighting, and so on with normal voltage current.

The assembled do-it-yourself self-powered free energy generator is designed to complete the circuit. Some craftsmen use this method to recharge the battery, which gives the initial impulse to the system. For your own safety, it is important to consider the fact that the output voltage of the system is high. If you forget about caution, you can get a severe electric shock. Since a 25kW do-it-yourself free energy generator can bring both benefits and dangers.

Who needs all this?

Almost anyone who is familiar with the basics of the laws of physics from school curriculum. The power supply of your own home can be completely transferred to the ecological and affordable energy of the ether. With the use of such technologies, transport and production costs. The atmosphere of our planet will become cleaner, the process of the "greenhouse effect" will stop.